How Does the Algebraic Thinking Process of Students Solve Numeracy Problems Based on Brain Dominance?
Kata Kunci:
Algebraic Thingking Process, Numeracy, Brain DominanceAbstrak
The low algebraic and numeracy abilities of students indicate the importance of understanding the thought processes underlying mathematical problem solving. Therefore, studying algebraic thinking processes based on brain dominance is important as a basis for developing more effective learning strategies. This study aims to analyze the algebraic thinking process in solving numeracy problems based on brain dominance. This study uses a qualitative method with an exploratory approach. The data collection technique is an exploratory process using the method think out loud and unstructured interviews. The instruments used were the researcher as the key instrument, numeracy questions and brain dominance tests. Data sources were divided into 3 categories, including the implementation location, namely the school, the actors in this study were taken using an exploration process, namely 2 subjects, and the activity in this study was the algebraic thinking process of students in solving numeracy problems. Data analysis was carried out with the following steps: data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study were that students with left and right brain dominance both fulfilled the algebraic thinking indicators (Pattern Seeking, Pattern Recognition, and Generalization) which were in line with the numeracy indicators (Knowing, Applying, and Reasoning), although there were differences in the thinking process. Left brain dominant students tended to think more systematically and consistently in identifying information, building mathematical models, and drawing conclusions, while right brain dominant students relied more on visual understanding, intuition, and exploration of various alternative solutions
Referensi
Akgun, L., & Ozdemir, M. E. (2006). Students’ Understanding of the Variable as General Number and Unknown: a Case Study. The Teaching of Mathematics, IX(1), 45–51.
Cahyanintyas, Novita, D., & Toto. (2018). Analisis Proses Berpikir Aljabar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 6(1), 50–60.
Cahyati, V. I., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2022). Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Numerasi Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1277
Feurzeig, W. (1986). Algebra Slaves and Agents in a Logo-Based Mathematics Curriculum. Instructional Science, 14, 229–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051822
Hoon, T. S., Singh, P., Han, C. T., Nasir, N. M., Rasid, N. S. B. M., & Zainal, N. B. (2020). An analysis of knowledge in STEM: Solving algebraic problems. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 16(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.24191/AJUE.V16I2.10304
Jensen, E. (2008). Brain Based Learning (Yusron, N., Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. van den. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0
Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic Thinking in the Early Grades : What Is It? Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151.
Kordjazi, Z., & Ghonsooly, B. (2015). Brain dominance and test format: A case of vocabulary. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0603.29
Kusuma A., Waluya S., Rochmad, & Mariani, S. (2024). Algebraic Thinking Process of Students with High Mathematical Ability in Solving Linear Equations Based on Cognitive Systems. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(3), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.03.14
Mason, J., Graham, A., & Wilder, S. J. (2005). Developing Thinking in Algebra. Great Britain by T.J. International.
Nurmalitasari, D., & Khoiri, M. (2024). Defragmentation of construction hole thinking process of junior high school students in solving numeration literacy questions. 12(2), 327–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2024v12n2a8
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Result The State of Learning and Equity in Education (Volume I). In Perfiles Educativos (Issue 183). PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ozdogru, A. (2014). Mind, Brain, and Education: An Emerging Transdisciplinary Field of Learning and Development. The Journal of Neurobehavioral Sciences, 1(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.5455/jnbs.1408373410
Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pada PIAUD, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah, Pub. L. No. 5, 5 5 (2022).
Pusmendik. (2025). Komponen, Level, Domain, Subdomain, Kompetensi dan Contoh Soal. Pusmendik. https://pusmendik.kemdikbud.go.id/an/asesmen_kompetensi_minimum/view/literasi-matematika
Rahmawati, A. W., Juniati, D., & Lukito, A. (2019). Algebraic Thinking Profiles of Junior High Schools’ Pupil in Mathematics Problem Solving. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(4), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i4.137
Shadrikov, V. D., Kurginyan, S. S., & Martynova, O. V. (2016). Psychological studies of thought: Thoughts about a concept of thought. Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 13(3), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2016-3-558-575
Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A Systematic Review on Algebraic Thinking in Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11486
Sukmaangara, B., & Madawistama, S. T. (2023). How Do Students Thinking Processes in Solving Originality and Elaboration Problems of Mathematical Creative Thinking Based on Brain Domination? Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i2.13649
Sukmaangara, B., Muhtadi, D., & Madawistama, S. T. (2021). Bagaimana Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau Dari Dominasi Otak ? Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 3(2), 151–164.
Tendero, J. B. (2000). Hemispheric Dominance and Language Proficiency Levels in the Four Macro Skills of the Western Mindanao State University College Students [Western Mindanao State University, Filipina]. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003233961-9
TIMSS. (2015). TIMSS 2015. Https://Timssandpirls.Bc.Edu. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/timss-2015/about-timss-2015/
Tout, D., & Gal, I. (2015). Perspectives on numeracy: reflections from international assessments. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 691–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0672-9
Ubuz, B., Erbas, A. K., Cetinkaya, B., & Ozgeldi, M. (2010). Exploring the quality of the mathematical tasks in the new Turkish elementary school mathematics curriculum guidebook: The case of algebra. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0258-5
United Nations. (2023). Goals 4. Https://Sdgs.Un.Org/. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
Wahyuni, R., Herman, T., & Fatimah, S. (2023). Letters in Algebra as the Transition from Arithmetic Thinking to Algebraic Thinking. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i3.2369
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Bayu Sukmaangara Bayu, Ahmad Novis Nur Farisi Novis

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








