Sangguniang Kabataan intervention programs in disaster contexts: Evidence from selected barangays in Baguio City

Authors

  • Rose Chell Anne Cuarto Rojas University of Baguio, Philippines

Keywords:

Disaster Governance, Intervention Programs, Local Governance, Sangguniang Kabataan, Youth Participation

Abstract

Disasters pose complex governance challenges, particularly at the barangay level where public services are most immediate; yet youth participation in local disaster governance remains insufficiently institutionalized and empirically examined. This study analyzes the intervention programs implemented by the Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) in selected barangays in Baguio City during the COVID-19 Enhanced Community Quarantine, focusing on how youth participation responds to disaster governance challenges. Anchored in Community Youth Development and Empowerment Theory, the study employed a qualitative descriptive design using semi-structured interviews with 19 SK officials representing 19 selected barangays. The findings reveal that SK officials consistently faced resource, institutional, coordination, and operational constraints that limited their participation and program implementation. Despite these constraints, they implemented a range of interventions—including relief and social protection initiatives, public health support, governance assistance, and youth engagement activities—demonstrating adaptability and responsiveness to community needs. The Mental Health Support Program emerged as a best practice due to its responsiveness, innovation, and replicability. The study underscores the need to institutionalize youth participation, strengthen capacity development, and enhance coordination mechanisms in disaster governance. These findings imply that local governments and disaster governance bodies should formally integrate SK participation into disaster planning and implementation, provide sustained capacity-building and resources, and establish clear coordination protocols to enable youth to contribute effectively to disaster preparedness, response, and recovery

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Checkoway, B., & Aldana, A. (2013). Four forms of youth civic engagement for diverse democracy. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1894–1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.005

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2020). DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2020-62: Supplementary LGU guidelines on the implementation of Enhanced Community Quarantine in Luzon, and state of public health emergency in other parts of the country due to the COVID-19 threat. DILG.

Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2020). Omnibus guidelines on the implementation of community quarantine in the Philippines.

Fernandez, G., & Shaw, R. (2013). Youth council participation in disaster risk reduction in Infanta and Makati, Philippines: A policy review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 4(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-013-0014-x

Mort, M., Rodriguez-Giralt, I., & Delicado, A. (Eds.). (2020). Children and young people’s participation in disaster risk reduction: Agency and resilience. Policy Press.

National Youth Commission. (2023). Philippine Youth Development Plan 2023–2028. National Youth Commission.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Republic Act No. 10121. (2010). Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010.

Republic Act No. 10742. (2015). Sangguniang Kabataan Reform Act of 2015.

Republic Act No. 10742. (2016). An act establishing reforms in the Sangguniang Kabataan creating enabling mechanisms for meaningful youth participation in nation-building, and for other purposes. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340.

United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Youth empowerment in crisis response and recovery.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2019). Reducing risks and building resilience at the local level: A global review of local DRR strategies (Contributing Paper to the Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2019). UNDRR.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2019). Words into action guidelines: Youth engagement in disaster risk reduction.

United Nations. (2010). Good practices in youth development.

United Nations. (2020). Youth and COVID-19: Impacts on jobs, education, rights and mental well-being.

Wong, N. T., Zimmerman, M. A., & Parker, E. A. (2020). A typology of youth participation and empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 65(1–2), 100–114.

World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.

World Health Organization. (2020). COVID-19: Strategic planning and operational guidance for maintaining essential health services during an outbreak (Interim guidance, 20 March 2020). WHO.

World Health Organization. (2022). Mental health and psychosocial support in emergencies.

Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

How to Cite

Rose Chell Anne Cuarto Rojas. (2026). Sangguniang Kabataan intervention programs in disaster contexts: Evidence from selected barangays in Baguio City. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 7(3), 604–611. Retrieved from http://i-jeh.com/index.php/ijeh/article/view/513