Differences in Creative Thinking Ability of Vocational High School Students in Solving Contextual Mathematical Problems

Authors

  • Imaniar Resha Erfana IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Hadi Kusmanto IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Toheri IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v3i2.159

Keywords:

Creative Thinking Skills, Contextual Mathematics, Problem Solving

Abstract

In learning activities, various problems that are often encountered include students who still do not understand the material, or students abilities that are not yet clear, so that teachers find it difficult to apply appropriate learning. In this study, the aim was to obtain information about several aspects of students creative thinking skills in solving contextual mathematics problems for class XI SMK Islamic Center Cirebon. The population is 750 students, with a sample of 238 students. The type of research used in this research is quantitative, by analyzing the results in the form of numbers that are processed by statistical analysis. The findings of this study indicate that the students creative thinking ability shows that contextual mathematical problem solving is still in the very low category with an average value of 37,78. But in it there is an aspect of Elaboration with an average value of 61,13 which is in the medium category. Thus, in solving contextual mathematical problems, especially in Three Dimensional Geometry, the ability to think in detail is sufficient when making image objects that are easier to understand from the illustrations provided. Therefore, the ability to think in the Elaboration aspect must be maintained and the Fluency, Flexibility, and Originality aspects must be further improved. The results showed that there were significant differences between the ability to think creatively with each major, including the best major is Accounting and Financial Institutions (AKL). Teachers can maintain relationships with fellow teachers and establish better communication so that mathematics learning is achieved even though students come from different majors

Author Biographies

Imaniar Resha Erfana, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia

 

 

 

Hadi Kusmanto, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia

 

 

 

Toheri, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia

 

 

 

References

Aliyyatunnisa, A. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif, Kritis, dan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Dalam Academic-Constructive Cotroversy (AC).

Alma, B. (2009). Kewirausahaan. Alfabeta.

Anggo, M. (2011). Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa. Edumatika, 1(2), 35–42. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/edumatica/article/view/182

Astuti, S. P. (2015). Pengaruh Kemampuan Awal dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika. Formatif, 5(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i1.167

Bernard, M., Nurmala, N., Mariam, S., & Rustyani, N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis SIswa SMP Kelas IX Pada Materi Bangun Datar. SJME, 2(2).77-83 https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v2i2.1317

Ekowati, C. K., Darwis, M., Upa, H. M. D. P., & Tahmir, S. (2015). The Application of Contextual Approach in Learning Mathematics to Improve Students Motivation At SMPN 1 Kupang. International Education Studies, 8(8), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n8p81

Kusmanto, H. (2013). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikiri Kritis dan Keaktifan Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pendekatan Kontruktivisme (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Pada Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 2 Ciwaru Kabupaten kuningan). Jurnal Eduma, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v2i2.37

Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018

King, L. A. (2016). Psikologi Umum Sebuah Pandangan Apresiatif. Salemba Humanika.

Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Model Pembelajaran RICOSRE yang Berpotensi Memberdayakan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(5), 676–685. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/9180

Nafarin, M. (2004). Akuntansi Pendekatan Siklus dan Pajar untuk Perusahaan Industri & Dagang. Ghalia Indonesia.

Nugroho, G. N., & Riyanto, O. R. (2019). Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Reviewed From Self-Efficacy in Discovery Learning. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v8i1.4593

Nurhayati, E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Inovatif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Ratna, T. S. H., Moh, S., & Susiani. (2017). Critical Thinking Skill : Konsep dan Indikator Penilaian. Taman Cendikia, 1(2).127-133. https://doi.org/10.30738/tc.v1i2.1945

Raviansyah, M. R., & Nasir, M. (2019). Pada Mata Diklat Gambar Teknik Otomotif Kelas X Teknik Kendaraan Ringan Smk Negeri 1 Pariaman. 594–602.

Romli, M. (2017). Profil Koneksi Matematis Siswa Perempuan Sma Dengan Kemampuan Matematika Tinggi Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. JIPMat, 1(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v1i2.1241

Sakti, I. (2011). Korelasi Pengetahuan Alat Praktikum Fisika Dengan Kemampuan Psikomotorik Siswa di SMA Negeri 1 Kota Bengkulu. Exacta, 9(1).

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Peneliatian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Sunardjo, R. N., Yudhianto, S. A., & Rahman, T. (2016). Analisis implementasi keterampilan berpikir dasar dan kompleks dalam buku IPA pegangan siswa SMP kurikulum 2013 dan implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran. Preceeding Biology Education, 13(1), 133–144.

Toheri, Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where exactly for enhance critical and creative thinking: The use of problem posing or contextual learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.877

Toheri, Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where exactly for enhance critical and creative thinking: The use of problem posing or contextual learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.877

Wardhani, W. S. D. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa Berdasarkan Kerangka Kerja Mason. October, 297–313.

Wiley, J., Hoboken, I., & Jersey, N. (2003). Essentials of Entrepreneurship : What it Takes to Create Succesful Enterprises/TiE, The Indus Entrepeneurs. TiE (The Indus Entrepreneurs).

Downloads

Published

2023-06-17

How to Cite

Erfana, I. R., Kusmanto, H., & Toheri. (2023). Differences in Creative Thinking Ability of Vocational High School Students in Solving Contextual Mathematical Problems. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v3i2.159