Online Learning Evaluation and Student Satisfaction in Islamic Religious Education Distance Programs

Authors

  • Syaikhu Muhamad Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Tamsik Udin Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Suklani Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia

Keywords:

Distance Learning, Evaluation of the Learning Process, Student Satisfaction

Abstract

The shift from face-to-face instruction to online learning has introduced significant challenges in maintaining student satisfaction, particularly in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) courses. Issues such as limited interaction, unclear academic information, restricted access to academic services, and perceptions of tuition fees during distance learning have raised concerns regarding the effectiveness of online learning implementation. Student satisfaction is a crucial indicator of learning quality and plays an important role in achieving the educational objectives of PAI programs. This study aims to examine the impact of online learning on student satisfaction among third-semester students enrolled in the Distance Learning Program (PJJ) of Islamic Religious Education at IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Specifically, the study examines the impact of online learning evaluation on student satisfaction, while also identifying other factors that contribute to it. A quantitative research approach was employed using regression analysis. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed to third-semester PJJ students, measuring variables such as online learning evaluation, clarity of academic information, accessibility of academic staff, and perceptions of tuition fees. The results indicate that the constant has a significant effect on student satisfaction (coefficient = 24.125, p < 0.05), whereas the online learning evaluation variable does not have a statistically significant effect (coefficient = 0.011, p > 0.05). Despite the non-significant influence of learning evaluation, other factors—particularly clarity of information, tuition fee structure, and staff accessibility—were found to meaningfully contribute to student satisfaction. These findings suggest that improving the clarity of academic communication, reviewing tuition fee policies, and enhancing the accessibility of academic and administrative services are crucial strategies for enhancing student satisfaction. Such improvements can support the development of more effective and sustainable online learning practices within Islamic Religious Education programs

References

Alfiyani, N., Supriatman, M., & Masduki, M. (2023). Management of education personnel in improving administrative performance in the 4.0 era. Educational Insights, 1(1), 10–14.

Asali-van Der Wal, R. (2023). Assessment of student satisfaction with distance and blended learning. Integration of Education, 27(2), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.111.027.202302.262-272

Bacila, M. F., Pop, M. C., Scridon, M. A., & Ciornea, R. (2014). Development of an instrument for measuring student satisfaction in business educational institutions. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 16(37), 841–856.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Kumar, J. A., Ibrahim, N., McEvoy, D., & Sehsu, J. (2022). Anthropomorphised learning contents: Investigating learning outcomes, epistemic emotions and gaze behaviour. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11504-8

Kurniawan, A. (2016). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan CmapTools dalam pembelajaran fisika untuk meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif dan mempertahankan retensi siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v14i1.3209

Meilani, M. N. (2023). Implementation of school information system management in the use of digital resources. Educational Insights, 1(2), 88–96.

Mubarok, F. S. (2022). Pemanfaatan new media untuk efektivitas komunikasi di era pandemi. Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi Makna, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.30659/jikm.v10i1.20302

Nuryakin, N., Rakotoarizaka, N. L. P., & Musa, H. G. (2023). The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived easy to use on student satisfaction: The mediating role of attitude to use online learning. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 11(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2023.011.03.5

Prabowo, H., Yuniarty, Y., & Bramulya Ikhsan, R. (2022). Student engagement mechanism of online learning: The effect of service quality on learning management system. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 6(3), 681. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.3.1263

Rat Dwiyana Putra, I. D. G. (2019). Peran kepuasan belajar dalam mengukur mutu pembelajaran dan hasil belajar. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v5i1.756

Saluky, S., Riyanto, O. R., & Rahmah, S. (2022). Digital competence of post-pandemic teachers based on gender, work period, and certification factors. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 166–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v11i2.11751

Sanusi, S. B., Muslichah, I., Abdullah, N. H. N., & Rozzani, N. (2023). Online learning satisfaction: A comparative study on Malaysian and Indonesian students. In O. Dastane, A. Aman, & N. S. Bin Mohd Satar (Eds.), Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage (pp. 224–240). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6782-4.ch013

Saputra, N., Thoha, N., Sutanto, H., Sriwardiningsih, E., & Putra, O. P. B. (2023). Analyzing the effect of grit, collaborative learning, and crisis magnitude on online learning satisfaction. 2023 8th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR), 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIR57571.2023.10147455

Setyawati, A., Wijaya, S., & Widjaja, D. C. (2022). Effect of student’s perception of learning innovation on student engagement and student satisfaction. Petra International Journal of Business Studies, 5(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.9744/ijbs.5.2.198-205

Siming, L., Gao, J., Xu, D., & Shaf, K. (2015). Factors leading to students' satisfaction in the higher learning institutions. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31), 114–118.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wibawa, E. A., Mulyani, H., & Darmawan, R. (2023). Pengaruh interaksi mahasiswa dan kehadiran dosen terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa pada pembelajaran daring [The effect of student interaction and lecturer presence on student satisfaction in online learning]. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 1(19), 75. https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v1i19.5995

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zahri, F. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran learning cycle terhadap kualitas proses, hasil belajar dan retensi hasil belajar siswa pada materi pokok asam basa. Belantika Pendidikan, 1(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v1i2.23

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

Muhamad, S., Udin, T., & Suklani. (2026). Online Learning Evaluation and Student Satisfaction in Islamic Religious Education Distance Programs. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 6(1), 145–154. Retrieved from https://i-jeh.com/index.php/ijeh/article/view/383