The Legacy of Thatcherism: Educational Inequalities and Family Capital in Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me

Authors

  • Jingxuan Hu University of Science and Technology Beijing, China
  • Xiaohui Liang University of Science and Technology Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v5i2.307

Keywords:

BrexLit, Brexit, Child development, Ian McEwan, Machines Like Me.

Abstract

In Ian McEwan's acclaimed science fiction novel Machines Like Me, most critics focus on the ethical anxieties surrounding human characters and artificial intelligence interactions. However, these studies often overlook the novel’s potential as a compelling work of BrexLit, particularly in its deep exploration of the lasting impact of Thatcherism on British social life. This includes its focus on family structures and the ethical challenges of child development, factors that contributed to the conditions leading to Brexit. The central issue explored is the generational reproduction of educational inequalities exacerbated by Thatcher’s policies. This study aims to analyze the disadvantaged position of Mark, a young boy growing up in a family facing economic hardship, fragmented social networks, and limited educational opportunities. Using Pierre Bourdieu’s three-dimensional framework of cultural capital theory—economic capital, social capital, and cultural capital—the paper examines how deficiencies in these forms of capital contribute to the reproduction of inequalities in Mark’s life. These challenges are reflected in the lives of three adult characters: Charlie, Mariam, and Miranda. The findings reveal that Mark’s psychological trauma and practical dilemmas are direct consequences of insufficient family support in terms of these three forms of capital. This highlights how Thatcher-era policies intensified educational inequalities across generations. The study underscores the need for policies that address educational disparities and strengthen family capital to mitigate the long-term effects of inequality, particularly in the post-Brexit era

References

Backhouse, R. E. (2002). The macroeconomics of Margaret Thatcher. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24 ( 3 ) , 313 – 334 . https://doi.org/ 10.1080/104277102200004767

Barnett, W. S., & Belfield, C. R. (2006). Early childhood development and social mobility. The Future of Children, 16(2), 73–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3844792

Barry, P. (2009). Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester University Press.

Bateman, B. W. (2002). There are many alternatives: Margaret Thatcher in the history of economic thought. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24(3), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/104277102200004758

Bourdieu, P. (1986). "The Forms of Capital." In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/074051789007001002

Bourdieu, P. (1996). On the family as a realized category. Theory, Culture & Society, 13(3), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276396013003002

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). Sage Publications. (Original work published 1970)

Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG). (n.d.). Poverty’s threat to childhood revealed by new research. https://cpag.org.uk/news/povertys-threat-childhood-revealed- new-research

Davies, K. (2021). Sticking together in ‘divided Britain’: Talking Brexit in everyday family relationships. Sociology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211011569

Davies, K., & Carter, A. (2021). Living with Brexit: Families, relationships and the temporalities of everyday personal life in ‘Brexit Britain’. The Sociological Review, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261241260112

DiMaggio, P. (1979). Review: On Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1460–1474. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777906

Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.

Eich, S. (2023). “There is no alternative!”—The case for a co(n)temporary English fiction: Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me and Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein. On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture, 15. https://doi.org/ 10.22029/oc.2023.1360

Ergler, C. R., & Wood, B. E. (2018). Engaging with Bourdieu: A review of the utilization of Bourdieu within children and young people's geographies. In T. Skelton & S. Aitken (Eds.), Establishing geographies of children and young people (Vol. 1, pp. 147 – 169 ) . Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-981-10-7082-3_10

Ferrari, R. (2022). A plunge into otherness: Ethics and literature in Machines Like Me by Ian McEwan. Between, 12(24), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.13125/2039-6597/5166

Ganteau, J.-M., & Onega, S. (Eds.). (2021). Trauma and Romance in Contemporary British Literature. Routledge.

Gartman, D. (2002). Bourdieu's theory of cultural change: Explication, application, critique. Sociological Theory, 20(2), 255–277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3108649

Gulcu, T. Z. (2020). What if robots surpass man morally? Dehumanising humans, humanising robots in Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 6(4), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.18178/ ijlll.2020.6.4.272

Head, Dominic. Ian McEwan. Manchester UP, 2007.

Kilkey, M. (2017). Conditioning family-life at the intersection of migration and welfare: The implications for ‘Brexit families’. Journal of Social Policy, 46(4), 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941700037X

Kopka, K., & Schaffeld, N. (2020). Turing’s missing algorithm: The brave new world of Ian McEwan’s android novel Machines Like Me. Journal of Literature and Science, 13, 52–74.

McEwan, I. (2019). Machines Like Me. Jonathan Cape.

McGuigan, J. (2014). Cool Capitalism. Pluto Press.

MIGZEN Research Brief, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6834639

Monaghan, D. (2001). Margaret Thatcher, and the struggle for working-class identity. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 29(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01956050109601004

Nunn, H. (2002). Thatcher, politics and fantasy: The political culture of gender and nation. Lawrence & Wishart.

Patra, I. (2020). Man with the machine: Analyzing the role of autopoietic machinic agency in Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me. Psychology and Education, 57(9), 610– 620. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348296982

Popular Culture, 4(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1386/jepc.4.2.123_1

Rivkin, J., & Ryan, M. (2017). Literary Theory: An Anthology (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Schnurr, M. (2020). Neoliberalism: The connection between Thatcher and Brexit. Tinwell, A. (2013). The impact of Thatcherism in popular culture. Journal of European

Willetts, D. (2021). Thatcherism and Brexit as political projects. The Political Quarterly, 92(3), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13033

Zambelli, E., Benson, M., & Sigona, N. (2022). British-European families after Brexit.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-16

How to Cite

Hu, J., & Liang, X. (2025). The Legacy of Thatcherism: Educational Inequalities and Family Capital in Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 5(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v5i2.307