Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Light Verb Constructions: Collocational Patterns in Persian and English
Keywords:
Collostructional analysis, Light verb constructions, Persian, Qualia structure, Role, and Reference GrammarAbstract
Light Verb Constructions (LVCs) have garnered considerable attention in linguistic research, yet the study of co-selection between verbs and nouns within LVCs from a cross-linguistic perspective remains underexplored. This study addresses the interaction between LVC components, mainly focusing on Persian, which features a unique marginal verb structure that collates with specific nouns. This structure is similar to light verb constructions in English, though differences exist in the two languages' collocational patterns and lexical selection. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the collocational relationships within LVC components in Persian and English, identifying commonalities and distinct characteristics across these languages. The methodology employed in this study is corpus-based cross-linguistic analysis, utilizing a comparative approach to examine the collocational patterns between verbs and nouns in Persian and English LVCs. Data were drawn from linguistic corpora for each language and then analyzed to identify co-selection patterns and the underlying semantic relationships. The findings reveal a significant co-selection relationship between nouns and their constructions in LVCs across both languages, although the specific patterns vary according to each language's context. These results indicate that collocations within LVCs influence syntactic structure and affect semantic relationships and cross-linguistic understanding. This study highlights the importance of lexical co-selection in LVCs for cross-linguistic research, which, in turn, may deepen insights into the interaction between different languages. Extend cross-linguistic analysis to include a broader range of languages and explore contextual factors influencing co-selection in LVCs. This can benefit fields such as translation, foreign language learning, and the development of natural language processing technologies.
References
Bonial, C., & Pollard, K. A. (2020). Choosing an event description: What a PropBank study reveals about the contrast between light verb constructions and counterpart synthetic verbs. Journal of Linguistics, 56(3), 577–600.
Brugman, C. (2001). Light verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences, 23(4–5), 551–578.
Butt, M. (2003). The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 1–9.
Butt, M. (2010). The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure (pp. 48–78).
D’Andrea, L. (2021). Constructions with a supporting verb from a multilingual perspective: A contrastive analysis between Spanish, Italian, French, English, and German. Linguistica Pragensia, 31(2), 214–231.
Dowty, D. R. (1986). The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1), 37–61.
Family, N. (2008). Verbal islands in Persian. Folia Linguistica, 45(1), 1–30.
Feiz, P. (2011). Traveling through space in Persian and English: A comparative analysis of motion events in elicited narratives. Language Sciences, 33(3), 401–416.
Gries, S. Th. (2023). Overhauling collostructional analysis: Towards more descriptive simplicity and more explanatory adequacy. Cognitive Semantics, 9(3), 351–386.
Ishii, T. (2009). On PF-LF mismatch in the Japanese light verb construction. Language and Linguistics, 10(4), 629–667.
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English. Oxford University Press.
Martínez Caro, E., & Arús-Hita, J. (2020). Give as a light verb. Functions of Language, 27(3), 280–306.
Metairy, J., Lauwers, P., Enghels, R., Taverniers, M., & Van Peteghem, M. (2020). A micro-typological perspective on resultative secondary predicates: The case of nomination verb constructions. Language Sciences, 78.
Nickel, G. (1968). Complex verbal structures in English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 6(1–4), 1–22.
Nolan, B., & Diedrichsen, E. (2017). Argument realisation in complex predicates and complex events: Verb-verb constructions at the syntax-semantic interface. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pustejovsky, J. (2011). Coercion in a general theory of argument selection. Linguistics, 49(6), 1401–1431.
Riziq, D., & Hamdan, J. (2022). The semantic structure of motion verbs in Jordanian Arabic: Talmy’s typology revisited. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), 143–169.
Robinson, S., Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press.
Ronan, P. (2019). Simple versus light verb constructions in Late Modern Irish English correspondence: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Studia Neophilologica, 91(1), 31–48.
Saeedi, Z. (2017). Nominal prediction in Persian. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Argument realization in complex predicates and complex events. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Singh, P. (2023). Echo reduplication, light verbs, and compound verbs in Hindi-Urdu: Point of difference or sameness. Dialectologia, 30, 8.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243.
Valin, R. D. (2005). Exploring the syntax–semantics interface: List of abbreviations. Cambridge University Press.
Valin, R. D. (2010). Role and reference grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160.
Wierzbicka, A. (1982). Why can you have a drink when you can’t have an eat? Language, 58(4), 753–799.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qiqi Guan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
